Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 29
Filtrar
1.
Physiotherapy ; 108: 120-128, 2020 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32807362

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Patients with musculoskeletal diseases can potentially be assessed by an extended scope physiotherapist (ESP) instead of by an orthopaedic surgeon (OS). OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effectiveness of the diagnostic musculoskeletal assessment performed by ESP compared to OS. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, EMBASE, CINAHL, PEDro and reference lists of included studies and previous reviews were searched in November 2015. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Studies were included if they evaluated adults with a musculoskeletal disease referred to an outpatient orthopaedic clinic where a diagnostic assessment had been conducted by an ESP. DATA EXTRACTION: Data were extracted using a customised data extraction sheet. Two reviewers using checklists evaluated methodological independently. RESULTS: We included one randomised controlled trial and 31 observational studies. Diagnostic agreement between ESPs and OSs was 65 to 100% across studies. Health care cost savings for diagnostic assessments performed by ESPs were 27 to 49% compared to OSs. Overall, 77 to 100% of the patients were satisfied with the ESP assessment. Results were comparable on diagnostic agreement, cost and satisfaction in studies with high, moderate and low risk of bias. LIMITATIONS: Risk of bias in the included studies. CONCLUSION AND IMPLICATION OF KEY FINDINGS: Diagnostic assessments performed by ESP may be as beneficial as or even better than assessment performed by OSs in terms diagnostic agreement, costs and satisfaction. However, the methodological quality was generally too low to determine the clear effectiveness of ESP assessment, and more high quality studies are needed. Systematic review registration number: PROSPERO CRD42014014229.


Asunto(s)
Toma de Decisiones Clínicas , Atención a la Salud/economía , Enfermedades Musculoesqueléticas/diagnóstico , Satisfacción del Paciente , Fisioterapeutas/economía , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Diagnóstico por Imagen/economía , Humanos
3.
Phys Ther ; 100(4): 591-599, 2020 04 17.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31800062

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The growing student debt of physical therapists entering the workforce, coupled with the growth in projected need, raises concerns about where and how entry-level physical therapists will practice and if these choices will be affected by their debt burden. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to identify the debt profile of entry-level physical therapists and explore relationships between student debt and clinical practice setting choices. METHODS: This study utilized a cross-sectional survey design to identify debt profiles and explore relationships between student debt and the clinical practice choices of entry-level physical therapists. RESULTS: The mean debt-to-income ratio based on the total reported educational debt was 197% (93%). The most frequently reported debt range for doctor of physical therapy (DPT) debt and total educational debt was $100,000 to $124,999. Despite the setting itself being rated as the most important factor (83%), 28% of participants reported debt as a barrier to their desired practice setting. In addition, when considering job choice overall, 57% of the participants reported that their student debt has had an effect on their decision. LIMITATIONS: This study is limited by its small sample size, originating from 1 state, and being taken by convenience from a special interest group. Data were collected via an anonymous survey, which increases the risk of selection bias. In addition, there are further personal, family, and institutional characteristics that were not collected in this study, which may influence the interaction between student debt and clinical practice choices. CONCLUSION: The results of this study suggest that practice setting choice may be affected by physical therapist student debt, and student debt may be a barrier overall to practice and career choices in physical therapy.


Asunto(s)
Renta , Fisioterapeutas/economía , Ubicación de la Práctica Profesional/economía , Apoyo a la Formación Profesional/economía , Adulto , Selección de Profesión , Estudios Transversales , Escolaridad , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Tamaño de la Muestra , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Adulto Joven
4.
Phys Ther ; 100(4): 621-632, 2020 04 17.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31764990

RESUMEN

Early physical therapy models hold great promise for delivering high-value care for individuals with musculoskeletal pain. However, existing physical therapist practice and research standards are misaligned with value-based principles, which limits the potential for growth and sustainability of these models. This Perspective describes how the value proposition of early physical therapy can be improved by redefining harm, embracing a prognostic approach to clinical decision making, and advocating for system-wide guideline-adherent pain care. It also outlines the need to adopt a common language to describe these models and embrace new, rigorous study designs and analytical approaches to better understand where and how early physical therapy delivers value. The goal is to define a clear path forward to ensure physical therapists are aligned within health care systems to deliver on the American Physical Therapy Association's vision of high-value care in a rapidly changing health care environment.


Asunto(s)
Dolor Musculoesquelético/terapia , Fisioterapeutas/economía , Modalidades de Fisioterapia/economía , Compra Basada en Calidad/economía , Toma de Decisiones Clínicas/métodos , Adhesión a Directriz , Humanos , Lenguaje , Modelos Teóricos , Estudios Observacionales como Asunto/normas , Manejo del Dolor/normas , Modalidades de Fisioterapia/efectos adversos , Modalidades de Fisioterapia/normas , Especialidad de Fisioterapia , Pronóstico , Distribución Aleatoria , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Investigación/normas , Proyectos de Investigación , Nivel de Atención , Resultado del Tratamiento
5.
Chiropr Man Therap ; 27: 30, 2019.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31210927

RESUMEN

Background: Society expects professionals to promote their businesses in an ethical manner, refraining from misleading or deceptive marketing due to the potential to harm members of the community. In Australia this expectation resides in the Australian registration board advertising guidelines or the Health Practitioner Regulation National Law. Registration board data indicate there are many health care professionals failing to meet these expectations. The aims of this research were to determine the frequency, type and nature of at-risk advertising by Australian chiropractors and physiotherapists and whether there is a correlation between professional association membership and advertising guideline compliance. Method: A cross sectional audit examining practitioner advertising was performed on representative samples of Australian chiropractors and physiotherapists. Two auditors examined advertising by 380 physiotherapists and 359 chiropractors for material potentially in breach of the regulatory authorities' advertising guidelines. The advertising appeared on practitioner websites and linked Facebook pages. Results: Two-hundred and fifty-eight (72%) audited chiropractors and 231 (61%) audited physiotherapists had breaches of the Advertising Guidelines on their websites and linked Facebook pages. The frequency of breaches by chiropractors was higher. The type and nature of the breaches by chiropractors was potentially more harmful. Membership in a professional association influenced neither the frequency nor the severity of breaches with chiropractors. Discussion: Advertising breaches were common in both samples even though regulators and professional associations provide practitioners with explicit information on how to comply with advertising guidelines. Breaches by chiropractors were more numerous and more serious due to their greater potential to lead consumers to make inappropriate and potentially harmful healthcare decisions.Stronger enforcement strategies may have a positive effect on compliance.


Asunto(s)
Publicidad/legislación & jurisprudencia , Quiropráctica/economía , Fisioterapeutas/economía , Publicidad/normas , Australia , Quiropráctica/legislación & jurisprudencia , Quiropráctica/organización & administración , Estudios Transversales , Humanos , Fisioterapeutas/legislación & jurisprudencia , Fisioterapeutas/organización & administración
6.
BMC Musculoskelet Disord ; 20(1): 186, 2019 May 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31043169

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: A model for triaging patients in primary care to provide immediate contact with the most appropriate profession to treat the condition in question has been developed and implemented in parts of Sweden. Direct triaging of patients with musculoskeletal disorders (MSD) to physiotherapists at primary healthcare centres has been proposed as an alternative to initial assessment by general practitioners (GPs) and has been shown to have many positive effects. The aim of this study was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness from the societal perspective of this new care-pathway through primary care regarding triaging patients with MSD to initial assessment by physiotherapists compared to standard practice with initial GP assessment. METHODS: Nurse-assessed patients with MSD (N = 55) were randomised to initial assessment and treatment with either physiotherapists or GPs and were followed for 1 year regarding health-related quality of life, utilization of healthcare resources and absence from work for MSD. Quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) were calculated based on EQ5D measured at 5 time-points. Costs for healthcare resources and production loss were compiled. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERS) were calculated. Multiple imputation was used to compensate for missing values and bootstrapping to handle uncertainty. A cost-effectiveness plane and a cost-effectiveness acceptability curve were construed to describe the results. RESULTS: The group who were allocated to initial assessment by physiotherapists had slightly larger gains in QALYs at lower total costs. At a willingness-to-pay threshold of 20,000 €, the likelihood that the intervention was cost-effective from a societal perspective including production loss due to MSD was 85% increasing to 93% at higher thresholds. When only healthcare costs were considered, triaging to physiotherapists was still less costly in relation to health improvements than standard praxis. CONCLUSION: From the societal perspective, this small study indicated that triaging directly to physiotherapists in primary care has a high likelihood of being cost-effective. However, further larger randomised trials will be necessary to corroborate these findings. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02218749 . Registered August 18, 2014.


Asunto(s)
Análisis Costo-Beneficio/estadística & datos numéricos , Enfermedades Musculoesqueléticas/terapia , Atención Primaria de Salud/economía , Triaje/economía , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Vías Clínicas/economía , Vías Clínicas/organización & administración , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Médicos Generales/economía , Médicos Generales/estadística & datos numéricos , Costos de la Atención en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Enfermedades Musculoesqueléticas/diagnóstico , Enfermedades Musculoesqueléticas/psicología , Enfermeras y Enfermeros/economía , Enfermeras y Enfermeros/estadística & datos numéricos , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Fisioterapeutas/economía , Fisioterapeutas/estadística & datos numéricos , Atención Primaria de Salud/organización & administración , Calidad de Vida , Años de Vida Ajustados por Calidad de Vida , Suecia , Resultado del Tratamiento , Triaje/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto Joven
7.
Health Care Manag (Frederick) ; 38(1): 37-43, 2019.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30640238

RESUMEN

Cash-based physical therapy, a model in which the clinicians do not accept insurance payments and accept only direct payment, is quickly becoming an enticing option for clinicians who own their own practice. The purpose of this study was to describe service utilization for a single cash-based physical therapy clinic. Forty-eight charts of patients who had been discharged between 2013 and 2016 were randomly selected. The data were deidentified prior to the researchers gaining access. Chronic diagnoses were predominately prevalent (n = 28). The lumbo/pelvic region of diagnoses (39.6%) and knee/leg region of diagnoses (29.2%) encompassed the majority of the diagnoses. The mean physical therapy utilization for the cohort per episode of care was 8.0 ± 8.1 visits per episode of care, total cost of $780.19 ± 530.30 per episode of care, and $97.52 per visit. This study is the first to present data regarding costs, utilization, and patient demographics for a cash-based physical therapy clinic.


Asunto(s)
Costos Directos de Servicios/estadística & datos numéricos , Gastos en Salud , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Fisioterapeutas/economía , Práctica Privada/economía , Adulto , Instituciones de Atención Ambulatoria , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos
8.
Seizure ; 65: 72-79, 2019 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30616222

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To estimate costs associated with the current management of Dravet syndrome (DS), explore psychosocial aspects of the disease in caregivers and siblings, and identify patient characteristics associated with higher costs in a large, predominantly European survey cohort of patients and their caregivers conducted in 2016. METHODS: Health and social care resource use, productivity and quality of life (QoL) data were summarised. Costs for European five (EU5) countries (France, Germany, Italy, Spain and UK) were calculated and patients with high and low current seizure burden compared. Direct healthcare costs and out-of-pocket costs were calculated using literature reported health service costs and participant reported costs, respectively. RESULTS: Direct annual costs of management of non-seizure-related symptoms ($7929) contributed to approximately 50% of all costs (including medication). Excluding medication, non-seizure-related costs dominated costs of care. Cost for patients with high seizure burden were higher for seizure-related healthcare use and physiotherapy, but lower for other therapies. Most (80%) caregivers reported an influence on their career choices and 28% of those in work had missed over three working days in the past four weeks for emergency or routine needs of their child. Caregivers had little free time, relied on family members for support and respite, and experienced emotional stress and uncertainty about their child's future healthcare needs. CONCLUSION: Families caring for a DS patient manage considerable social and financial impacts. Total direct costs of DS patients (excluding drugs) are driven by non-seizure-related healthcare use and high seizure burden is associated with higher healthcare costs.


Asunto(s)
Cuidadores/psicología , Epilepsias Mioclónicas , Servicios de Salud/economía , Fisioterapeutas/economía , Adolescente , Factores de Edad , Niño , Preescolar , Estudios de Cohortes , Costos y Análisis de Costo , Epilepsias Mioclónicas/economía , Epilepsias Mioclónicas/enfermería , Epilepsias Mioclónicas/psicología , Epilepsias Mioclónicas/rehabilitación , Europa (Continente) , Planes de Aranceles por Servicios/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Cooperación Internacional , Masculino , Calidad de Vida/psicología , Hermanos/psicología , Adulto Joven
9.
Australas J Ageing ; 37(2): E42-E48, 2018 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29570236

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To determine current Australian allied health rehabilitation weekend service provision and to identify perceived barriers to and facilitators of weekend service provision. METHODS: Senior physiotherapists from Australian rehabilitation units completed an online cross-sectional survey exploring current service provision, staffing, perceived outcomes, and barriers and facilitators to weekend service provision. RESULTS: A total of 179 (83%) eligible units responded, with 94 facilities (53%) providing weekend therapy. A Saturday service was the most common (97%) with the most frequent service providers being physiotherapists (90%). Rehabilitation weekend service was perceived to increase patient/family satisfaction (66%) and achieve faster goal attainment (55%). Common barriers were budgetary restraints (66%) and staffing availability (54%), with facilitators including organisational support (76%), staff availability (62%) and staff support (61%). CONCLUSION: Despite increasing evidence of effectiveness, only half of Australian rehabilitation facilities provide weekend services. Further efforts are required to translate evidence from clinical trials into feasible service delivery models.


Asunto(s)
Atención Posterior/organización & administración , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/organización & administración , Unidades Hospitalarias , Admisión y Programación de Personal/organización & administración , Fisioterapeutas/provisión & distribución , Centros de Rehabilitación , Adolescente , Adulto , Atención Posterior/economía , Anciano , Actitud del Personal de Salud , Australia , Presupuestos , Estudios Transversales , Encuestas de Atención de la Salud , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/economía , Costos de Hospital , Unidades Hospitalarias/economía , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Satisfacción del Paciente , Admisión y Programación de Personal/economía , Fisioterapeutas/economía , Fisioterapeutas/psicología , Recuperación de la Función , Centros de Rehabilitación/economía , Factores de Tiempo , Recursos Humanos , Carga de Trabajo , Adulto Joven
10.
Physiother Theory Pract ; 34(9): 714-722, 2018 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29319380

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this article is to describe the delivery and acceptability of a short, structured training course for critical care physiotherapy and its effects on the knowledge and skills of the participants in Sri Lanka, a lower-middle income country. METHODS: The two-day program combining short didactic sessions with small group workshops and skills stations was developed and delivered by local facilitators in partnership with an overseas specialist physiotherapist trainer. The impact was assessed using pre/post-course self-assessment, pre/post-course multiple-choice-question (MCQ) papers, and an end-of-course feedback questionnaire. RESULTS: Fifty-six physiotherapists (26% of critical care physiotherapists in Sri Lanka) participated. Overall confidence in common critical care physiotherapy skills improved from 11.6% to 59.2% in pre/post-training self-assessments, respectively. Post-course MCQ scores (mean score = 63.2) and percentage of passes (87.5%) were higher than pre-course scores (mean score = 36.6; percentage of passes = 12.5%). Overall feedback was very positive as 75% of the participants were highly satisfied with the course's contribution to improved critical care knowledge. CONCLUSIONS: This short, structured, critical care focused physiotherapy training has potential benefit to participating physiotherapists. Further, it provides an evidence that collaborative program can be planned and conducted successfully in a resource poor setting. This sustainable short course model may be adaptable to other resource-limited settings.


Asunto(s)
Cuidados Críticos , Países en Desarrollo , Educación Continua , Fisioterapeutas/educación , Desarrollo de Personal , Adulto , Actitud del Personal de Salud , Conducta Cooperativa , Cuidados Críticos/economía , Curriculum , Países en Desarrollo/economía , Educación Continua/economía , Escolaridad , Retroalimentación , Femenino , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Recursos en Salud/economía , Humanos , Cooperación Internacional , Aprendizaje , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Fisioterapeutas/economía , Fisioterapeutas/psicología , Evaluación de Programas y Proyectos de Salud , Sri Lanka , Desarrollo de Personal/economía , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
11.
Physiotherapy ; 104(1): 98-106, 2018 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28964524

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate outcomes following a state-wide implementation of post arthroplasty review (PAR) clinics for patients following total hip and knee arthroplasty, led by advanced musculoskeletal physiotherapists in collaboration with orthopaedic specialists. DESIGN AND SETTING: A prospective observational study analysed data collected by 10 implementation sites (five metropolitan and five regional/rural centres) between September 2014 and June 2015. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The Victorian Innovation and Reform Impact Assessment Framework was used to assess efficiency, effectiveness (access to care, safety and quality, workforce capacity, utilisation of skill sets, patient and workforce satisfaction) and sustainability (stakeholder engagement, succession planning and availability of ongoing funding). RESULTS: 2362 planned occasions of service (OOS) were provided for 2057 patients. Reduced patient wait times from referral to appointment were recorded and no adverse events occurred. Average cost savings across 10 sites was AUD$38 per OOS (Baseline $63, PAR clinic $35), representing a reduced pathway cost of 44%. Average annual predicted total value of increased orthopaedic specialist capacity was $11,950 per PAR clinic (range $6149 to $23,400). The Australian Orthopaedic Association review guidelines were met (8/10 sites, 80%) and patient-reported outcome measures were introduced as routine clinical care. High workforce and patient satisfaction were expressed. Eighteen physiotherapists were trained creating a sustainable workforce. Eight sites secured ongoing funding. CONCLUSIONS: The PAR clinics delivered a safe, cost-efficient model of care that improved patient access and quality of care compared to traditional specialist-led workforce models.


Asunto(s)
Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Cadera/rehabilitación , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Rodilla/rehabilitación , Cirujanos Ortopédicos/organización & administración , Satisfacción del Paciente , Fisioterapeutas/organización & administración , Instituciones de Atención Ambulatoria/organización & administración , Australia , Conducta Cooperativa , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Eficiencia Organizacional , Adhesión a Directriz , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/organización & administración , Fuerza Laboral en Salud/organización & administración , Humanos , Cirujanos Ortopédicos/economía , Seguridad del Paciente , Fisioterapeutas/economía , Fisioterapeutas/normas , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Estudios Prospectivos , Calidad de la Atención de Salud/organización & administración , Derivación y Consulta/estadística & datos numéricos , Listas de Espera
12.
Med Teach ; 40(12): 1221-1230, 2018 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29216780

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Student failure creates additional economic costs. Knowing the cost of failure helps to frame its economic burden relative to other educational issues, providing an evidence-base to guide priority setting and allocation of resources. The Ingredients Method is a cost-analysis approach which has been previously applied to health professions education research. In this study, the Ingredients Method is introduced, and applied to a case study, investigating the cost of pre-clinical student failure. METHODS: The four step Ingredients Method was introduced and applied: (1) identify and specify resource items, (2) measure volume of resources in natural units, (3) assign monetary prices to resource items, and (4) analyze and report costs. Calculations were based on a physiotherapy program at an Australian university. RESULTS: The cost of failure was £5991 per failing student, distributed across students (70%), the government (21%), and the university (8%). If the cost of failure and attrition is distributed among the remaining continuing cohort, the cost per continuing student educated increases from £9923 to £11,391 per semester. CONCLUSIONS: The economics of health professions education is complex. Researchers should consider both accuracy and feasibility in their costing approach, toward the goal of better informing cost-conscious decision-making.


Asunto(s)
Empleos en Salud/economía , Fisioterapeutas/economía , Especialidad de Fisioterapia/economía , Abandono Escolar , Universidades/economía , Australia , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Empleos en Salud/educación , Humanos , Estudios de Casos Organizacionales , Fisioterapeutas/educación , Especialidad de Fisioterapia/educación , Estudiantes del Área de la Salud , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
13.
Physiotherapy ; 103(4): 341-351, 2017 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28801031

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: There is large variation in models-of-care involving the professional substitution of doctors with physiotherapists. OBJECTIVE: To establish the impact upon patients and health services, of substituting doctors with physiotherapists in the management of common musculoskeletal disorders. DATA SOURCES: Medline, CINAHL and ABI Complete databases, and hand-searching of related studies. STUDY SELECTION: Randomised and non-randomised clinical trials, inter-rater reliability and comparative studies comparing the outcomes of usual care from doctors, with outcomes when the doctor was substituted with a physiotherapist. STUDY APPRAISAL AND SYNTHESIS METHODS: Two reviewers evaluated all studies using the Downs and Black Instrument. Meta-analysis was not possible due to study heterogeneity. A descriptive review was undertaken. RESULTS: 14 studies of moderate to low quality met the inclusion criteria. Professional substitution with a physiotherapist causes no significant change to health outcomes and inconsistent variation in the use of healthcare resources. There is insufficient health economic data to determine overall efficiency. In the selected presentations studied, physiotherapists made similar diagnostic and management decisions to orthopaedic surgeons and patients are as, or more satisfied with a physiotherapist. LIMITATIONS: Further high quality health and economic research is needed, in less selective patient populations, to determine the optimal role for physiotherapists. CONCLUSION AND IMPLICATIONS OF KEY FINDINGS: Physiotherapists provide a professional alternative to doctors for musculoskeletal disorders but the health economic implications of this model are presently unclear. Systematic Review Registration Number PROSPERO (Registration number CRD42015027671).


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Musculoesqueléticas/terapia , Fisioterapeutas/organización & administración , Médicos/organización & administración , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Humanos , Variaciones Dependientes del Observador , Satisfacción del Paciente , Fisioterapeutas/economía , Fisioterapeutas/normas , Médicos/economía , Médicos/normas , Rol Profesional , Resultado del Tratamiento
15.
Physiother Theory Pract ; 31(8): 594-600, 2015.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26451511

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Legislative gains in the US allow physical therapists to function in expanded scopes of practice including direct access and referral to specialists. The combination of direct access with privileges to order imaging studies directly offers a desirable practice status for many physical therapists, especially in musculoskeletal focused settings. Although direct access is legal in all US jurisdictions, institutional-based physical therapy settings have not embraced these practices. Barriers cited to implementing direct access with advanced practice are concerns over medical and administrative opposition, institutional policies, provider qualifications and reimbursement. This administrative case report describes the process taken to allow therapists to see patients without a referral and to order diagnostic imaging studies at an academic medical center. Nine-month implementation results show 66 patients seen via direct access with 15% referred for imaging studies. Claims submitted to 20 different insurance providers were reimbursed at 100%. DISCUSSION: While institutional regulations and reimbursement are reported as barriers to direct access, this report highlights the process one academic medical center used to implement direct access and advanced practice radiology referral by updating policies and procedures, identifying advanced competencies and communicating with necessary stakeholder groups. Favorable reimbursement for services is documented.


Asunto(s)
Diagnóstico por Imagen , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud , Privilegios del Cuerpo Médico , Fisioterapeutas , Rol Profesional , Servicio de Radiología en Hospital , Derivación y Consulta , Centros Médicos Académicos , Habilitación Profesional , Diagnóstico por Imagen/economía , Costos de la Atención en Salud , Política de Salud , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/economía , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/legislación & jurisprudencia , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/organización & administración , Humanos , Reembolso de Seguro de Salud , Privilegios del Cuerpo Médico/economía , Privilegios del Cuerpo Médico/legislación & jurisprudencia , Privilegios del Cuerpo Médico/organización & administración , Modelos Organizacionales , Estudios de Casos Organizacionales , Fisioterapeutas/economía , Fisioterapeutas/legislación & jurisprudencia , Fisioterapeutas/organización & administración , Servicio de Fisioterapia en Hospital/economía , Servicio de Fisioterapia en Hospital/legislación & jurisprudencia , Servicio de Fisioterapia en Hospital/organización & administración , Formulación de Políticas , Desarrollo de Programa , Servicio de Radiología en Hospital/economía , Servicio de Radiología en Hospital/legislación & jurisprudencia , Servicio de Radiología en Hospital/organización & administración , Derivación y Consulta/economía , Derivación y Consulta/legislación & jurisprudencia , Derivación y Consulta/organización & administración , Estados Unidos
16.
J Physiother ; 61(3): 148-54, 2015 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26093804

RESUMEN

QUESTIONS: What is the economic value for an individual to invest in physiotherapy undergraduate education in Australia? How is this affected by increased education costs or decreased wages? DESIGN: A cost-benefit analysis using a net present value (NPV) approach was conducted and reported in Australian dollars. In relation to physiotherapy education, the NPV represents future earnings as a physiotherapist minus the direct and indirect costs in obtaining the degree. Sensitivity analyses were conducted to consider varying levels of experience, public versus private sector, and domestic versus international student fees. Comparable calculations were made for educational investments in medicine and nursing/midwifery. RESULTS: Assuming an expected discount rate of 9.675%, investment in education by domestic students with approximately 34 years of average work experience yields a NPV estimated at $784,000 for public sector physiotherapists and $815,000 for private sector therapists. In relation to international students, the NPV results for an investment and career as a physiotherapist is estimated at $705,000 in the public sector and $736,000 in the private sector. CONCLUSION: With an approximate payback period of 4 years, coupled with strong and positive NPV values, physiotherapy education in Australia is a financially attractive prospect and a viable value proposition for those considering a career in this field.


Asunto(s)
Modalidades de Fisioterapia/economía , Modalidades de Fisioterapia/educación , Especialidad de Fisioterapia/economía , Especialidad de Fisioterapia/educación , Australia , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Humanos , Inversiones en Salud , Fisioterapeutas/economía , Fisioterapeutas/educación
17.
Rheumatology (Oxford) ; 54(2): 302-9, 2015 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25173349

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to conduct a cost-utility analysis of the Education, Self-management and Upper Limb Exercise Training in People with RA (EXTRA) programme compared with usual care. METHODS: A within-trial incremental cost-utility analysis was conducted with 108 participants randomized to either the EXTRA programme (n = 52) or usual care (n = 56). A health care perspective was assumed for the primary analysis with a 36 week follow-up. Resource use information was collected on interventions, medication, primary and secondary care contacts, private health care and social care costs. Quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) were calculated from the EuroQol five-dimension three-level (EQ-5D-3L) questionnaire responses at baseline, 12 and 36 weeks. RESULTS: Compared with usual care, total QALYs gained were higher in the EXTRA programme, leading to an increase of 0.0296 QALYs. The mean National Health Service (NHS) costs per participant were slightly higher in the EXTRA programme (by £82), resulting in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of £2770 per additional QALY gained. Thus the EXTRA programme was cost effective from an NHS perspective when assessed against the threshold of £20 000-£30 000/QALY gained. Overall, costs were lower in the EXTRA programme compared with usual care, suggesting it was the dominant treatment option from a societal perspective. At a willingness-to-pay of £20 000/QALY gained, there was a 65% probability that the EXTRA programme was the most cost-effective option. These results were robust to sensitivity analyses accounting for missing data, changing the cost perspective and removing cost outliers. CONCLUSION: The physiotherapist-led EXTRA programme represents a cost-effective use of resources compared with usual care and leads to lower health care costs and work absence. TRIAL REGISTRATION: International Standard Randomized Controlled Trial Number Register; http://www.controlled-trials.com/isrctn/ (ISRCTN14268051).


Asunto(s)
Artritis Reumatoide/economía , Terapia por Ejercicio/economía , Educación del Paciente como Asunto/economía , Autocuidado/economía , Adulto , Anciano , Brazo , Artritis Reumatoide/terapia , Costo de Enfermedad , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Fisioterapeutas/economía , Calidad de Vida , Años de Vida Ajustados por Calidad de Vida , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto Joven
18.
Trials ; 15: 503, 2014 Dec 21.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25527842

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The early management of orthopaedic outpatients by physiotherapists may be useful in reducing public hospital waiting lists. Physiotherapists in Australia are prevented by legislation and funding models from investigating, prescribing, injecting and referring autonomously. This gap in service is particularly noticeable in the management of shoulder pain in early-access physiotherapy services, as patients needing corticosteroid injection face delays or transfer to other services for this procedure. This trial will investigate the clinical (decision making and outcomes) and economic feasibility of a physiotherapist prescribing and delivering corticosteroid and local anaesthetic injections for shoulder pain in an Australian public hospital setting. METHODS/DESIGN: A double-blinded (patient and assessor) non-inferiority randomised controlled trial will compare an orthopaedic surgeon and a physiotherapist prescribing and delivering corticosteroid injections to the shoulder. Agreement in decision making between the two clinicians will be investigated, and economic information will be obtained for estimating disease burden and an economic evaluation. The surgeon and the physiotherapist will independently assess patients, and 64 eligible participants will be randomised to receive subacromial injection of corticosteroid and local anaesthetic from either the surgeon or the physiotherapist. Post-injection, all participants will receive physiotherapy. The primary outcome measure will be the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index measured at baseline, and at 6 and 12 weeks post-injection. Analysis will be conducted on an intention-to-treat basis and compared to a per-protocol analysis. A cost-utility analysis will be undertaken from the perspective of the health funder. DISCUSSION: Findings will assist policy makers and services in improving access for orthopaedic patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Australia and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry: 12612000532808 First registered: 21 May 2012. First participant randomized: 16 January 2013.


Asunto(s)
Corticoesteroides/administración & dosificación , Anestésicos Locales/administración & dosificación , Procedimientos Ortopédicos , Fisioterapeutas , Modalidades de Fisioterapia , Proyectos de Investigación , Articulación del Hombro/efectos de los fármacos , Dolor de Hombro/tratamiento farmacológico , Corticoesteroides/economía , Atención Ambulatoria , Anestésicos Locales/economía , Fenómenos Biomecánicos , Protocolos Clínicos , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Evaluación de la Discapacidad , Método Doble Ciego , Costos de los Medicamentos , Estudios de Factibilidad , Costos de Hospital , Hospitales Públicos , Humanos , Inyecciones Intraarticulares , Procedimientos Ortopédicos/economía , Dimensión del Dolor , Fisioterapeutas/economía , Modalidades de Fisioterapia/economía , Queensland , Recuperación de la Función , Articulación del Hombro/fisiopatología , Dolor de Hombro/diagnóstico , Dolor de Hombro/economía , Dolor de Hombro/fisiopatología , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento
19.
Trials ; 15: 409, 2014 Oct 25.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25344736

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Despite persistent calls to measure the effectiveness of educational interventions on patient outcomes, few studies have been conducted. Within musculoskeletal physiotherapy, the effects of postgraduate clinical mentoring on physiotherapist performance have been assessed, but the impact of this mentoring on patient outcomes remains unknown. The objective of this trial is to assess the effectiveness of a work-based mentoring programme to facilitate physiotherapist clinical reasoning on patient outcomes in musculoskeletal physiotherapy. METHODS/DESIGN: A stepped wedge cluster randomised controlled trial (CRCT) has been designed to recruit a minimum of 12 senior physiotherapists who work in musculoskeletal outpatient departments of a large National Health Service (NHS) organization. Participating physiotherapists will be randomised by cluster to receive the intervention at three time periods. Patients will be blinded to whether their physiotherapist has received the intervention. The primary outcome measure will be the Patient-Specific Functional Scale; secondary outcome measures will include the EQ-5D, patient activation, patient satisfaction and physiotherapist performance. Sample size considerations used published methods describing stepped wedge designs, conventional values of 0.80 for statistical power and 0.05 for statistical significance, and pragmatic groupings of 12 participating physiotherapists in three clusters. Based on an intergroup difference of 1.0 on the PSFS with a standard deviation of 2.0, 10 patients are required to complete outcome measures per physiotherapist, at time period 1 (prior to intervention roll-out) and at each of time periods 2, 3 and 4, giving a sample size of 480 patients. To account for the potential loss to follow-up of 33%, 720 sets of patient outcomes will be collected.All physiotherapist participants will receive 150 hours of mentored clinical practice as the intervention and usual in-service training as control. Consecutive, consenting patients attending treatment by the participating physiotherapists during data collection periods will complete outcome measures at baseline, discharge and 12 months post-baseline. The lead researcher will be blinded to the allocation of the physiotherapist when analyzing outcome data; statistical analysis will involve classical linear models incorporating both an intervention effect and a random intercept term to reflect systematic differences among clusters. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Assigned 31 July 2012: ISRCTN79599220.


Asunto(s)
Competencia Clínica , Capacitación en Servicio , Mentores , Enfermedades Musculoesqueléticas/terapia , Fisioterapeutas/educación , Modalidades de Fisioterapia/educación , Especialidad de Fisioterapia/educación , Proyectos de Investigación , Competencia Clínica/economía , Protocolos Clínicos , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Costos de la Atención en Salud , Humanos , Capacitación en Servicio/economía , Enfermedades Musculoesqueléticas/diagnóstico , Enfermedades Musculoesqueléticas/economía , Enfermedades Musculoesqueléticas/fisiopatología , Satisfacción del Paciente , Fisioterapeutas/economía , Fisioterapeutas/psicología , Modalidades de Fisioterapia/economía , Especialidad de Fisioterapia/economía , Análisis y Desempeño de Tareas , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Gales
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...